Authored by Sam Dorman via The Epoch Times,
A Georgia judge seemed skeptical on Oct. 1 of policies passed by the state’s election board.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney called one of the challenged rules “vague” and needing clarification. He said that much of the policies coming out of the state’s election board were inconsistent with a Supreme Court ruling on rules passed before an election.
One of the rules at issue in Tuesday’s trial provides a definition of certification that includes requiring county officials to conduct a “reasonable inquiry” before certifying results, but it does not specify what that means.
The other includes language allowing county election officials “to examine all election-related documentation created during the conduct of elections.”
Supporters of the rules say they are necessary to ensure the accuracy of the vote totals before county election officials sign off on them.
However, critics worry that supporters of Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump could use the rules to delay or deny certification if the former president loses the state to Democratic Vice President Kamala…
Read the full article here